Kingdom Report
www.kingdomvision.co.za
Week of 6 December 2025
Part 1: Age of Disclosure : Age of Deception
In November Amazon Prime did the world release of the much anticipated "The Age of Disclosure". This was a collection of America's top intelligence and political figures warning...the aliens and UFO's are real. This is the prelude to the coming great "Disclosure". Christians need to prepare for the coming great deception.
For those of you who have not or will not be seeing the 1 hour 50 minute documentary "The Age of Disclosure" I am here giving you a summary and description.
This is important. Which why this is Part 1. I will continue this series for a scriptural analysis. Also will give you a new eschatology framework especially for you who are conditioned to Dispensational Theology and a Muslim Antichrist or a world dictator from the supposed "Revived Roam Empire" of the EU.
You aren't ready for Matthew 24:24....
"For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect."
.....you aren't ready because your expect you won't be here. You will be gone in the Rapture.
The documentary emerges against a backdrop of intensifying American congressional scrutiny and public fascination. Following the explosive allegations of the early 2020s and the subsequent legislative battles over the UAP (Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon - or just plain UFO) Disclosure Act. The American congress passed a law that says "enough is enough" tell us what is going on in our skies.
The Age of Disclosure arrives as a definitive statement from the "pro-disclosure" faction within the U.S. national security apparatus. They are saying 'It is time to prepare the public for a national disclosure from the President. By assembling a cast of thirty-four interviewees that includes a sitting Secretary of State, former intelligence directors, and decorated combat veterans, the film attempts to dismantle the "giggle factor" that has historically insulated the UFO topic from serious inquiry.
This report provides an exhaustive, analysis of the documentary. It evaluates the credibility of the participants, dissects the ten most sensational claims presented, investigates the production's ties to Hollywood elites, and explores the profound implications of its central thesis: that the United States is in possession of non-human technology and biological evidence. Furthermore, this analysis extends into the geopolitical and theological domains, examining how such a revelation, if true, would reshape global security architectures and the fundamental tenets of the Abrahamic faiths—Christianity, Islam, and Judaism.
The implications I will follow up in the next parts to this series. For now I want you to know the extent to which the American government is going to prepare the American public for what is really going on.
And don't for a moment think these are outside "whistle blowers" trying to pressure the American government to come clean and tell us all. This is a production of the deepest parts of the Deep State trying to prepare the public for a coming shocking disclosure.
My job is to report this to you in detail to prepare you. And then in follow up series to give you a new perspective on where we really are on God's Kingdom timeline.
Just by way of background, the creator of the documentary Dan Farah is a close associate of Steven Spielberg having worked with him on "ET" and "Close Encounters of the Third Kind". That should give you a real "heads-up" about the power players involved. Think "big business, big media, big government".
The Strategy of "Prestige" Disclosure
The distribution strategy of The Age of Disclosure mirrors the release of a major motion picture rather than a niche documentary. Premiering at the South by Southwest (SXSW) Film Festival in March 2025—a venue known for tech-forward and culturally relevant media—the film generated initial buzz among cultural influencers before its wide release.
The Witnesses: A Credibility Analysis of the 34 Interviewees
The evidentiary weight of The Age of Disclosure rests almost entirely on the shoulders of its interviewees. The documentary eschews anonymous sources and blurred faces in favour of "on the record" testimony from thirty-four individuals with verified backgrounds in the U.S. government, military, and intelligence community. This roster represents a "who’s who" of the modern disclosure movement and the national security establishment.
The Political Echelon: Breaking the Stigma
The most significant deviation from previous UFO documentaries is the participation of active, high-ranking politicians. These are not retired legislators looking for a legacy project, but active players in the U.S. political system.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio:
The inclusion of Marco Rubio is the documentary's "nuclear option" regarding credibility. Although filmed while he was the Vice Chair of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI), his release-window status as the Secretary of State (in the Trump administration context of 2025) elevates his comments to the level of diplomatic doctrine. Rubio acts as the primary validator of the UFO threat. He states on camera: "We’ve had repeated instances of something operating in the airspace over restricted nuclear facilities, and it’s not ours. And we don’t know whose it is". This admission—that the U.S. does not control its own airspace over its most sensitive assets—is a profound admission of vulnerability from a top U.S. official.
Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY):
As a key architect of the UAP Disclosure Act and the creator of the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), Gillibrand’s participation underscores the bipartisan nature of the inquiry. She frames the issue as one of oversight and democratic hygiene: "It’s not acceptable to have secret parts of this government that no one ever sees". Her presence counters any partisan dismissal of the topic, presenting it as a national issue rather than a political one.
Senator Mike Rounds (R-SD):
Rounds, a conservative member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, reinforces the national security angle. His comments focus on the misappropriation of funds and the lack of accountability within the "Legacy Programs." His participation signals that the "fiscal hawk" wing of the Republican party is aligned with the disclosure narrative.
Representative André Carson (D-IN):
A member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI), Carson provides a perspective from the lower chamber, emphasizing the frustration of elected representatives who are "stonewalled" by the intelligence bureaucracy.
The Intelligence and Defense Insiders: The Architects of Disclosure
This cohort explains the mechanics of the cover-up. They are the "whistleblowers" and "gatekeepers" who have arguably defected from the regime of secrecy. My opinion: They are not defector "whistle blowers", they are the top of the CIA and are part of the official strategy that it is time for disclosure.
James Clapper (Former DNI):
The participation of James Clapper, the former Director of National Intelligence, represents a stunning reversal for the intelligence community. Historically, the DNI would be the position most responsible for maintaining the cover-up. Clapper’s willingness to sit for an interview and discuss the reality of UFO's suggests a support within the intelligence community—a belief among the "greybeards" that the secret can no longer be kept.
Luis Elizondo (Former Director, AATIP):
Serving as the film’s narrator and executive producer, Elizondo acts as the primary guide through the labyrinth of secrecy. A former counterintelligence officer, Elizondo’s narrative function is to bridge the gap between the viewer and the classified world. He characterizes the eighty-year secrecy as "lies and deception" and positions himself as a patriot forced to violate the code of silence to save the constitution. Nonsense. He is still part of the intelligence apparatus. Doing his job.
Jay Stratton (Former Director, UAP Task Force):
Stratton is arguably the most critical witness regarding biological claims. As the former head of the UAP Task Force, he sat at the apex of UAP data collection. His statement—"I have seen, with my own eyes, non-human craft and non-human beings"—is the specific, insider expert claim that anchors the documentary’s second half.
Christopher Mellon (Former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defence):
Mellon provides the strategic overview. As a scion of one of America’s wealthiest families and a veteran of the Pentagon, he represents the "establishment" wing of the disclosure movement. He articulates the legislative strategy and the risks of inaction.
The Scientific and Technical Experts
This group provides the theoretical framework, moving the discussion from "what did you see" to "how does it work."
Dr. Hal Puthoff: A legendary figure in parapsychology and physics (SRI, CIA remote viewing), Puthoff discusses the physics of the craft—Zero Point Energy (ZPE) and advanced engineering.
Dr. Eric Davis: An astrophysicist and defence contractor, Davis is the source of the most esoteric claims, including the "Holloman Landing" and briefings with high-level officials regarding off-world vehicles.
Dr. Garry Nolan: A Stanford pathologist who brings hard science to the biological effects. His analysis of immune system damage and brain morphology changes in contactees provides physical evidence for the "close encounter" phenomenon.
Dr. Tim Gallaudet: A retired Rear Admiral and oceanographer, Gallaudet expands the scope to the maritime domain, discussing Trans-Medium travel (air to sea).
The Ten Most Sensational Claims
The Age of Disclosure is structured around a series of escalating revelations. Moving beyond vague lights in the sky, the documentary makes ten specific, sensational claims that challenge the consensus reality of history, physics, and governance.
Claim 1: The "Legacy Program" and the 80-Year Cover-Up
The documentary’s central thesis is the existence of a distinct, unacknowledged special access program—referred to as the "Legacy Program"—that has operated since the 1940s (likely beginning with the 1947 Roswell crash). The film asserts this program is not merely investigating sightings but is actively managing a stockpile of recovered hardware and biological material. The claim is that the U.S. government has lied to the public for eight decades to maintain a monopoly on this material.
Claim 2: Recovery of Biological Entities ("Wetware")
Moving beyond "crashed saucers," the film explicitly claims the recovery of biological entities. Jay Stratton’s testimony that he has seen "non-human beings" is the linchpin of this claim. The film alleges that autopsies have been performed and that the biology of these entities is being studied alongside the technology. This shifts the narrative from "advanced drones" to "piloted craft" by living (or engineered) intelligences.
Claim 3: The 1964 Holloman Air Force Base Landing
Dr. Eric Davis provides a detailed account of an event at Holloman Air Force Base in New Mexico in 1964. He alleges that three craft approached the base, and one landed on the tarmac. A "non-human entity" reportedly exited the craft and engaged in a face-to-face interaction with U.S. base officials. This claim moves the phenomenon from "crash retrieval" to "diplomatic contact."
Claim 4: Presidential Knowledge (and Denial)
Connected to the Holloman claim, Davis asserts that former President George H.W. Bush (formerly CIA Director) was privately aware of the landing. Davis claims that in a 2003 briefing, Bush admitted the event took place but stated he was denied further access to the files by the program's gatekeepers. This illustrates a recurring theme: the President is not the ultimate authority on this issue.
Claim 5: Active Interference with Nuclear Weapons
Witnesses Robert Salas and Robert Jacobs describe separate incidents where UAPs demonstrated dominance over U.S. nuclear infrastructure. Salas details the 1967 Malmstrom AFB incident where ten nuclear missiles went "no-go" (offline) simultaneously as a glowing red orb hovered over the silo. Jacobs describes filming a warhead being disabled by a beam of light during a test flight in 1964. The claim is that UFO's are actively monitoring and neutralizing human nuclear capabilities.
Claim 6: The Secret Cold War (Reverse Engineering Arms Race)
The film posits that the Cold War never truly ended; it merely shifted to a race to reverse-engineer alien technology. The documentary claims that the U.S., Russia, and China are locked in a clandestine struggle to unlock the secrets of the recovered craft. The geopolitical implication is that whichever nation masters "anti-gravity" or "trans-medium travel" first will achieve total planetary dominance, justifying the extreme secrecy.
Claim 7: The Energy Embargo (Fossil Fuel Protection)
A socioeconomic claim presented is the "Energy Embargo." The documentary suggests that the recovered technology operates on principles of Zero Point Energy (ZPE) or vacuum energy. If released, this technology would provide limitless, free energy, rendering the fossil fuel industry—and the petrodollar system—obsolete overnight. The claim is that the secrecy is maintained not just for national security, but to protect the global economic status quo and the assets of energy cartels.
Claim 8: Biological Harm and Weaponization
Dr. Garry Nolan presents data indicating that close encounters are physically dangerous. He discusses cases of military personnel suffering from radiation burns, immune system collapse, and brain damage (similar to Havana Syndrome) after approaching UAPs. This challenges the "benevolent space brothers" narrative, suggesting the technology emits harmful radiation or that the entities have hostile defensive capabilities.
Claim 9: The Interdimensional / Cryptoterrestrial Hypothesis
While the public defaults to "aliens from space," the documentary introduces more complex origins. Luis Elizondo and others discuss the Interdimensional Hypothesis (entities from parallel realities) and the Cryptoterrestrial Hypothesis (an advanced species co-evolving with humans on Earth, hiding in oceans or underground). This reframes the phenomenon not as "visitation" but as "co-habitation."
Claim 10: Imminent "Catastrophic Disclosure"
The final claim is a warning. The participants argue that the secrecy is eroding due to the proliferation of civilian sensors and the actions of foreign adversaries. They warn of "Catastrophic Disclosure"—an uncontrolled, chaotic revelation (perhaps a mass sighting or a foreign leak) that would cause social collapse. The documentary positions itself as the alternative: "Controlled Disclosure."
Acclimatization and "Ontological Shock"
The documentary serves a psychological function: acclimatization. The concept of "Ontological Shock" refers to the trauma of having one’s fundamental worldview shattered. The U.S. government (or the faction behind this film) appears to be using the documentary to "soften the blow." By presenting the information in a calm, authoritative, and scientific manner, the film prepares the public mind for the reality of aliens, reducing the potential for panic when an official announcement is made.
Next week....Part 2
We need a new eschatology and a new Kingdom vision for who the "gods of this world" are that scriptures speakk about.
What is the meaning of this "disclosure" and coming deception.
How do we respond from scripure and from the Spirit and power of God.